↓ Skip to main content

Head-up tilt and hyperventilation produce similar changes in cerebral oxygenation and blood volume: an observational comparison study using frequency-domain near-infrared spectroscopy

Overview of attention for article published in Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
33 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Head-up tilt and hyperventilation produce similar changes in cerebral oxygenation and blood volume: an observational comparison study using frequency-domain near-infrared spectroscopy
Published in
Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie, January 2012
DOI 10.1007/s12630-011-9662-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lingzhong Meng, William W. Mantulin, Brenton S. Alexander, Albert E. Cerussi, Bruce J. Tromberg, Zhaoxia Yu, Kathleen Laning, Zeev N. Kain, Maxime Cannesson, Adrian W. Gelb

Abstract

During anesthesia, maneuvers which cause the least disturbance of cerebral oxygenation with the greatest decrease in intracranial pressure would be most beneficial to patients with intracranial hypertension. Both head-up tilt (HUT) and hyperventilation are used to decrease brain bulk, and both may be associated with decreases in cerebral oxygenation. In this observational study, our null hypothesis was that the impact of HUT and hyperventilation on cerebral tissue oxygen saturation (SctO2) and cerebral blood volume (CBV) are comparable.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 6%
Unknown 31 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 30%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 15%
Student > Master 4 12%
Other 3 9%
Professor 2 6%
Other 6 18%
Unknown 3 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 19 58%
Engineering 3 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 6%
Psychology 1 3%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 4 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 January 2012.
All research outputs
#20,657,128
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie
#2,541
of 2,878 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#202,329
of 248,985 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie
#12
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,878 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 248,985 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.