You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Random and aligned electrospun PLGA nanofibers embedded in microfluidic chips for cancer cell isolation and integration with air foam technology for cell release
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Nanobiotechnology, February 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12951-019-0466-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Chia-Cheng Yu, Yi-Wen Chen, Po-Ying Yeh, Yu-Sheng Hsiao, Wei-Ting Lin, Chiung-Wen Kuo, Di-Yen Chueh, Yun-Wen You, Jing-Jong Shyue, Ying-Chih Chang, Peilin Chen |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 1 | 33% |
| South Africa | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 71 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 71 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 6% |
| Researcher | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 10 | 14% |
| Unknown | 24 | 34% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 11% |
| Materials Science | 8 | 11% |
| Engineering | 7 | 10% |
| Chemistry | 6 | 8% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 11 | 15% |
| Unknown | 27 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 February 2019.
All research outputs
#13,542,652
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Nanobiotechnology
#401
of 1,534 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#173,469
of 354,058 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Nanobiotechnology
#7
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,534 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 354,058 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.