The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 59 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Conservation or politics? Australia's target to kill 2 million cats
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Conservation Letters, February 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1111/conl.12633 |
| Authors |
Tim S. Doherty, Don A. Driscoll, Dale G. Nimmo, Euan G. Ritchie, Ricky‐John Spencer |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 16 | 27% |
| Germany | 2 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
| Canada | 1 | 2% |
| Bosnia and Herzegovina | 1 | 2% |
| Spain | 1 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 36 | 61% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 39 | 66% |
| Scientists | 20 | 34% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 81 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 81 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 16% |
| Researcher | 13 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 10% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 6 | 7% |
| Other | 11 | 14% |
| Unknown | 21 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 26 | 32% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 20 | 25% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 7% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 2% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 5% |
| Unknown | 21 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 67. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 September 2023.
All research outputs
#671,370
of 26,233,885 outputs
Outputs from Conservation Letters
#239
of 1,091 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,157
of 369,326 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Conservation Letters
#7
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,233,885 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,091 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 53.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 369,326 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.