You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Ex Vivo Expansion of Human CD8+ T Cells Using Autologous CD4+ T Cell Help
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, January 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0030229 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Marcus O. Butler, Osamu Imataki, Yoshihiro Yamashita, Makito Tanaka, Sascha Ansén, Alla Berezovskaya, Genita Metzler, Matthew I. Milstein, Mary M. Mooney, Andrew P. Murray, Hiroyuki Mano, Lee M. Nadler, Naoto Hirano |
| Abstract |
Using in vivo mouse models, the mechanisms of CD4+ T cell help have been intensively investigated. However, a mechanistic analysis of human CD4+ T cell help is largely lacking. Our goal was to elucidate the mechanisms of human CD4+ T cell help of CD8+ T cell proliferation using a novel in vitro model. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 50% |
| Australia | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
| Scientists | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 100 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 3% |
| Germany | 2 | 2% |
| Portugal | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 94 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 19% |
| Researcher | 19 | 19% |
| Student > Bachelor | 15 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 16 | 16% |
| Unknown | 16 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 20 | 20% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 17 | 17% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 12 | 12% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 12 | 12% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 14 | 14% |
| Unknown | 19 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 February 2024.
All research outputs
#6,626,022
of 23,420,064 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#82,331
of 200,414 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#58,738
of 246,480 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#941
of 3,221 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,420,064 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 200,414 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 246,480 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,221 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.