You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Preferential Inhibition of Frontal-to-Parietal Feedback Connectivity Is a Neurophysiologic Correlate of General Anesthesia in Surgical Patients
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, October 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0025155 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Seung-Woo Ku, UnCheol Lee, Gyu-Jeong Noh, In-Gu Jun, George A. Mashour |
| Abstract |
The precise mechanism and optimal measure of anesthetic-induced unconsciousness has yet to be elucidated. Preferential inhibition of feedback connectivity from frontal to parietal brain networks is one potential neurophysiologic correlate, but has only been demonstrated in animals or under limited conditions in healthy volunteers. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 176 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 2 | 1% |
| Korea, Republic of | 2 | 1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 4 | 2% |
| Unknown | 161 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 32 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 29 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 20 | 11% |
| Professor | 14 | 8% |
| Other | 11 | 6% |
| Other | 38 | 22% |
| Unknown | 32 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 36 | 20% |
| Neuroscience | 29 | 16% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 16 | 9% |
| Psychology | 15 | 9% |
| Engineering | 9 | 5% |
| Other | 28 | 16% |
| Unknown | 43 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 September 2013.
All research outputs
#6,910,810
of 22,661,413 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#81,359
of 193,502 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,383
of 132,946 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#915
of 2,614 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,661,413 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 193,502 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 132,946 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2,614 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.