↓ Skip to main content

Tissue-Specific Function of Period3 in Circadian Rhythmicity

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
54 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
69 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Tissue-Specific Function of Period3 in Circadian Rhythmicity
Published in
PLOS ONE, January 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0030254
Pubmed ID
Authors

Julie S. Pendergast, Kevin D. Niswender, Shin Yamazaki

Abstract

The mammalian circadian system is composed of multiple central and peripheral clocks that are temporally coordinated to synchronize physiology and behavior with environmental cycles. Mammals have three homologs of the circadian Period gene (Per1, 2, 3). While numerous studies have demonstrated that Per1 and Per2 are necessary for molecular timekeeping and light responsiveness in the master circadian clock in the suprachiasmatic nuclei (SCN), the function of Per3 has been elusive. In the current study, we investigated the role of Per3 in circadian timekeeping in central and peripheral oscillators by analyzing PER2::LUCIFERASE expression in tissues explanted from C57BL/6J wild-type and Per3⁻/⁻ mice. We observed shortening of the periods in some tissues from Per3⁻/⁻ mice compared to wild-types. Importantly, the periods were not altered in other tissues, including the SCN, in Per3⁻/⁻ mice. We also found that Per3-dependent shortening of endogenous periods resulted in advanced phases of those tissues, demonstrating that the in vitro phenotype is also present in vivo. Our data demonstrate that Per3 is important for endogenous timekeeping in specific tissues and those tissue-specific changes in endogenous periods result in internal misalignment of circadian clocks in Per3⁻/⁻ mice. Taken together, our studies demonstrate that Per3 is a key player in the mammalian circadian system.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 69 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
Unknown 68 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 23%
Researcher 11 16%
Student > Bachelor 8 12%
Student > Master 8 12%
Professor 8 12%
Other 11 16%
Unknown 7 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 19 28%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 15 22%
Neuroscience 9 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 9%
Environmental Science 2 3%
Other 7 10%
Unknown 11 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 January 2024.
All research outputs
#7,412,246
of 22,661,413 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#87,960
of 193,502 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#70,581
of 243,373 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#1,140
of 3,220 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,661,413 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 193,502 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 243,373 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,220 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.