↓ Skip to main content

TERT promoter mutations are highly recurrent in SHH subgroup medulloblastoma

Overview of attention for article published in Acta Neuropathologica, October 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
90 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
114 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
TERT promoter mutations are highly recurrent in SHH subgroup medulloblastoma
Published in
Acta Neuropathologica, October 2013
DOI 10.1007/s00401-013-1198-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marc Remke, Vijay Ramaswamy, John Peacock, David J. H. Shih, Christian Koelsche, Paul A. Northcott, Nadia Hill, Florence M. G. Cavalli, Marcel Kool, Xin Wang, Stephen C. Mack, Mark Barszczyk, A. Sorana Morrissy, Xiaochong Wu, Sameer Agnihotri, Betty Luu, David T. W. Jones, Livia Garzia, Adrian M. Dubuc, Nataliya Zhukova, Robert Vanner, Johan M. Kros, Pim J. French, Erwin G. Van Meir, Rajeev Vibhakar, Karel Zitterbart, Jennifer A. Chan, László Bognár, Almos Klekner, Boleslaw Lach, Shin Jung, Ali G. Saad, Linda M. Liau, Steffen Albrecht, Massimo Zollo, Michael K. Cooper, Reid C. Thompson, Oliver O. Delattre, Franck Bourdeaut, François F. Doz, Miklós Garami, Peter Hauser, Carlos G. Carlotti, Timothy E. Van Meter, Luca Massimi, Daniel Fults, Scott L. Pomeroy, Toshiro Kumabe, Young Shin Ra, Jeffrey R. Leonard, Samer K. Elbabaa, Jaume Mora, Joshua B. Rubin, Yoon-Jae Cho, Roger E. McLendon, Darell D. Bigner, Charles G. Eberhart, Maryam Fouladi, Robert J. Wechsler-Reya, Claudia C. Faria, Sidney E. Croul, Annie Huang, Eric Bouffet, Cynthia E. Hawkins, Peter B. Dirks, William A. Weiss, Ulrich Schüller, Ian F. Pollack, Stefan Rutkowski, David Meyronet, Anne Jouvet, Michelle Fèvre-Montange, Nada Jabado, Marta Perek-Polnik, Wieslawa A. Grajkowska, Seung-Ki Kim, James T. Rutka, David Malkin, Uri Tabori, Stefan M. Pfister, Andrey Korshunov, Andreas von Deimling, Michael D. Taylor

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 114 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 109 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 24%
Researcher 23 20%
Student > Bachelor 13 11%
Student > Master 9 8%
Other 8 7%
Other 25 22%
Unknown 9 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 35 31%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 28 25%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 20 18%
Neuroscience 4 4%
Chemistry 2 2%
Other 7 6%
Unknown 18 16%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 July 2018.
All research outputs
#2,388,598
of 13,205,256 outputs
Outputs from Acta Neuropathologica
#532
of 1,649 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#70,203
of 337,865 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Acta Neuropathologica
#20
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,205,256 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 78th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,649 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 337,865 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.