You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
H3N2 Influenza Infection Elicits More Cross-Reactive and Less Clonally Expanded Anti-Hemagglutinin Antibodies Than Influenza Vaccination
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, October 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0025797 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
M. Anthony Moody, Ruijun Zhang, Emmanuel B. Walter, Christopher W. Woods, Geoffrey S. Ginsburg, Micah T. McClain, Thomas N. Denny, Xi Chen, Supriya Munshaw, Dawn J. Marshall, John F. Whitesides, Mark S. Drinker, Joshua D. Amos, Thaddeus C. Gurley, Joshua A. Eudailey, Andrew Foulger, Katherine R. DeRosa, Robert Parks, R. Ryan Meyerhoff, Jae-Sung Yu, Daniel M. Kozink, Brice E. Barefoot, Elizabeth A. Ramsburg, Surender Khurana, Hana Golding, Nathan A. Vandergrift, S. Munir Alam, Georgia D. Tomaras, Thomas B. Kepler, Garnett Kelsoe, Hua-Xin Liao, Barton F. Haynes |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 111 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 2% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Taiwan | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 107 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 33 | 30% |
| Researcher | 30 | 27% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 12 | 11% |
| Unknown | 12 | 11% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 33 | 30% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 28 | 25% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 9% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 7% |
| Engineering | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 12 | 11% |
| Unknown | 16 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 January 2024.
All research outputs
#7,794,295
of 24,980,180 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#102,530
of 216,439 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,083
of 144,171 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#932
of 2,582 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,980,180 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 216,439 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 144,171 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2,582 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.