↓ Skip to main content

Antibiotic resistance as a global threat: Evidence from China, Kuwait and the United States

Overview of attention for article published in Globalization and Health, April 2006
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
21 X users
patent
1 patent
facebook
1 Facebook page
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
204 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
305 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Antibiotic resistance as a global threat: Evidence from China, Kuwait and the United States
Published in
Globalization and Health, April 2006
DOI 10.1186/1744-8603-2-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ruifang Zhang, Karen Eggleston, Vincent Rotimi, Richard J Zeckhauser

Abstract

Antimicrobial resistance is an under-appreciated threat to public health in nations around the globe. With globalization booming, it is important to understand international patterns of resistance. If countries already experience similar patterns of resistance, it may be too late to worry about international spread. If large countries or groups of countries that are likely to leap ahead in their integration with the rest of the world--China being the standout case--have high and distinctive patterns of resistance, then a coordinated response could substantially help to control the spread of resistance. The literature to date provides only limited evidence on these issues. We study the recent patterns of antibiotic resistance in three geographically separated, and culturally and economically distinct countries--China, Kuwait and the United States--to gauge the range and depth of this global health threat, and its potential for growth as globalization expands. Our primary measures are the prevalence of resistance of specific bacteria to specific antibiotics. We also propose and illustrate methods for aggregating specific "bug-drug" data. We use these aggregate measures to summarize the resistance pattern for each country and to study the extent of correlation between countries' patterns of drug resistance. We find that China has the highest level of antibiotic resistance, followed by Kuwait and the U.S. In a study of resistance patterns of several most common bacteria in China in 1999 and 2001, the mean prevalence of resistance among hospital-acquired infections was as high as 41% (with a range from 23% to 77%) and that among community- acquired infections was 26% (with a range from 15% to 39%). China also has the most rapid growth rate of resistance (22% average growth in a study spanning 1994 to 2000). Kuwait is second (17% average growth in a period from 1999 to 2003), and the U.S. the lowest (6% from 1999 to 2002). Patterns of resistance across the three countries are not highly correlated; the most correlated were China and Kuwait, followed by Kuwait and the U.S., and the least correlated pair was China and the U.S. Antimicrobial resistance is a serious and growing problem in all three countries. To date, there is not strong international convergence in the countries' resistance patterns. This finding may change with the greater international travel that will accompany globalization. Future research on the determinants of drug resistance patterns, and their international convergence or divergence, should be a priority.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 305 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 4 1%
Sweden 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Philippines 1 <1%
Unknown 294 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 55 18%
Student > Master 54 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 35 11%
Researcher 24 8%
Other 15 5%
Other 50 16%
Unknown 72 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 49 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 47 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 22 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 19 6%
Social Sciences 12 4%
Other 76 25%
Unknown 80 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 32. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 February 2023.
All research outputs
#1,172,334
of 24,552,012 outputs
Outputs from Globalization and Health
#164
of 1,179 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,755
of 69,637 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Globalization and Health
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,552,012 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,179 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 69,637 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.