You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Twitter Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Future Directions in Conservation Research on Petrels and Shearwaters
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Marine Science, March 2019
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fmars.2019.00094 |
| Authors |
Airam Rodríguez, José M. Arcos, Vincent Bretagnolle, Maria P. Dias, Nick D. Holmes, Maite Louzao, Jennifer Provencher, André F. Raine, Francisco Ramírez, Beneharo Rodríguez, Robert A. Ronconi, Rebecca S. Taylor, Elsa Bonnaud, Stephanie B. Borrelle, Verónica Cortés, Sébastien Descamps, Vicki L. Friesen, Meritxell Genovart, April Hedd, Peter Hodum, Grant R. W. Humphries, Matthieu Le Corre, Camille Lebarbenchon, Rob Martin, Edward F. Melvin, William A. Montevecchi, Patrick Pinet, Ingrid L. Pollet, Raül Ramos, James C. Russell, Peter G. Ryan, Ana Sanz-Aguilar, Dena R. Spatz, Marc Travers, Stephen C. Votier, Ross M. Wanless, Eric Woehler, André Chiaradia |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 100 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 12 | 12% |
| Spain | 8 | 8% |
| Australia | 4 | 4% |
| Réunion | 4 | 4% |
| United States | 4 | 4% |
| Portugal | 3 | 3% |
| New Zealand | 2 | 2% |
| Peru | 2 | 2% |
| Chile | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 13 | 13% |
| Unknown | 46 | 46% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 70 | 70% |
| Scientists | 26 | 26% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 3% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 210 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 210 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 37 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 32 | 15% |
| Researcher | 28 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 26 | 12% |
| Other | 14 | 7% |
| Other | 24 | 11% |
| Unknown | 49 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 64 | 30% |
| Environmental Science | 53 | 25% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 9 | 4% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 4 | 2% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 16 | 8% |
| Unknown | 60 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 82. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 September 2023.
All research outputs
#494,971
of 24,477,448 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Marine Science
#319
of 9,938 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,356
of 385,646 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Marine Science
#10
of 198 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,477,448 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,938 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 385,646 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 198 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.