You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Assessing the Accuracy of Self-Reported Data: an Evaluation of the Toxics Release Inventory
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, January 2006
|
DOI | 10.1007/s10797-006-6666-3 |
Authors |
Scott de Marchi, James T. Hamilton |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 69 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 68 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 26% |
Student > Master | 11 | 16% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 6 | 9% |
Researcher | 5 | 7% |
Student > Bachelor | 5 | 7% |
Other | 14 | 20% |
Unknown | 10 | 14% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Business, Management and Accounting | 16 | 23% |
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 12 | 17% |
Environmental Science | 7 | 10% |
Social Sciences | 5 | 7% |
Computer Science | 4 | 6% |
Other | 11 | 16% |
Unknown | 14 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 October 2020.
All research outputs
#3,872,193
of 25,769,258 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Risk and Uncertainty
#88
of 425 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,133
of 175,820 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Risk and Uncertainty
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,769,258 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 425 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 175,820 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them