You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Use of a species-rich and degraded tropical estuary by Elasmobranchs
|
---|---|
Published in |
Brazilian Journal of Oceanography, December 2018
|
DOI | 10.1590/s1679-87592018020106604 |
Authors |
Fernanda Gonçalves-Silva, Marcelo Vianna |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 21 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 5 | 24% |
Student > Bachelor | 4 | 19% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 10% |
Lecturer | 1 | 5% |
Unknown | 9 | 43% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Environmental Science | 8 | 38% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 10% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 1 | 5% |
Chemistry | 1 | 5% |
Unknown | 9 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 February 2019.
All research outputs
#20,663,600
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Brazilian Journal of Oceanography
#56
of 80 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#340,804
of 445,442 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Brazilian Journal of Oceanography
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 80 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.3. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 445,442 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.