You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Tea Consumption Enhances Endothelial-Dependent Vasodilation; a Meta-Analysis
|
---|---|
Published in |
PLOS ONE, March 2011
|
DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0016974 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Rouyanne T. Ras, Peter L. Zock, Richard Draijer |
Abstract |
Tea consumption is associated with a lower risk of cardiovascular disease including stroke. Direct effects of tea components on the vasculature, particularly the endothelium, may partly explain this association. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Japan | 1 | 25% |
United States | 1 | 25% |
Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 79 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
Netherlands | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 77 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 18 | 23% |
Student > Bachelor | 11 | 14% |
Student > Master | 9 | 11% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 9% |
Lecturer | 4 | 5% |
Other | 10 | 13% |
Unknown | 20 | 25% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 17 | 22% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 10% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 9% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 5% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 4% |
Other | 16 | 20% |
Unknown | 24 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 October 2017.
All research outputs
#2,786,753
of 22,661,413 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#36,076
of 193,502 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,768
of 108,721 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#312
of 1,372 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,661,413 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 193,502 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 108,721 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,372 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.