↓ Skip to main content

Tea Consumption Enhances Endothelial-Dependent Vasodilation; a Meta-Analysis

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, March 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
4 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
123 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
79 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Tea Consumption Enhances Endothelial-Dependent Vasodilation; a Meta-Analysis
Published in
PLOS ONE, March 2011
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0016974
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rouyanne T. Ras, Peter L. Zock, Richard Draijer

Abstract

Tea consumption is associated with a lower risk of cardiovascular disease including stroke. Direct effects of tea components on the vasculature, particularly the endothelium, may partly explain this association.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 79 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
Netherlands 1 1%
Unknown 77 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 18 23%
Student > Bachelor 11 14%
Student > Master 9 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 9%
Lecturer 4 5%
Other 10 13%
Unknown 20 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 17 22%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 4%
Other 16 20%
Unknown 24 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 October 2017.
All research outputs
#2,786,753
of 22,661,413 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#36,076
of 193,502 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,768
of 108,721 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#312
of 1,372 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,661,413 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 193,502 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 108,721 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,372 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.