You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
What is the relevance of smallholders’ agroforestry systems for conserving tropical tree species and genetic diversity in circa situm, in situ and ex situ settings? A review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biodiversity and Conservation, January 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10531-012-0429-5 |
| Authors |
Ian K. Dawson, Manuel R. Guariguata, Judy Loo, John C. Weber, Ard Lengkeek, David Bush, Jonathan Cornelius, Luigi Guarino, Roeland Kindt, Calleb Orwa, Joanne Russell, Ramni Jamnadass |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 50% |
| Germany | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 322 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Colombia | 2 | <1% |
| Germany | 2 | <1% |
| Uganda | 1 | <1% |
| Indonesia | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Ghana | 1 | <1% |
| Kenya | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 5 | 2% |
| Unknown | 306 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 72 | 22% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 61 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 51 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 21 | 7% |
| Other | 17 | 5% |
| Other | 52 | 16% |
| Unknown | 48 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 139 | 43% |
| Environmental Science | 82 | 25% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 9 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 9 | 3% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 7 | 2% |
| Other | 21 | 7% |
| Unknown | 55 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 May 2021.
All research outputs
#6,674,496
of 23,854,458 outputs
Outputs from Biodiversity and Conservation
#987
of 2,319 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#69,878
of 288,312 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biodiversity and Conservation
#11
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,854,458 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,319 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 288,312 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.