You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Effectiveness of Later-Stage Exercise Programs vs Usual Medical Care on Physical Function and Activity After Total Knee Replacement
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JAMA Network Open, February 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.0018 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sara R. Piva, Michael J. Schneider, Charity G. Moore, M. Beatriz Catelani, Alexandra B. Gil, Brian A. Klatt, Anthony M. DiGioia, Gustavo J. Almeida, Samannaaz S. Khoja, Gwendolyn Sowa, James J. Irrgang |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 7 | 58% |
| Japan | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 4 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 9 | 75% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 17% |
| Scientists | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 163 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 163 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 23 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 19 | 12% |
| Researcher | 13 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 6% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 5% |
| Other | 21 | 13% |
| Unknown | 70 | 43% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 31 | 19% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 27 | 17% |
| Psychology | 6 | 4% |
| Neuroscience | 3 | 2% |
| Sports and Recreations | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 16 | 10% |
| Unknown | 77 | 47% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 27. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 November 2020.
All research outputs
#1,264,100
of 23,577,761 outputs
Outputs from JAMA Network Open
#4,275
of 7,713 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,153
of 354,407 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAMA Network Open
#97
of 181 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,761 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,713 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 129.1. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 354,407 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 181 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.