You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Comparison of Efficacy of Deep Brain Stimulation of Different Targets in Parkinson's Disease: A Network Meta-Analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, February 2019
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnagi.2019.00023 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Zhiqi Mao, Zhipei Ling, Longsheng Pan, Xin Xu, Zhiqiang Cui, Shuli Liang, Xinguang Yu |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Italy | 1 | 20% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 20% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 20% |
| United States | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 1 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 60% |
| Scientists | 2 | 40% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 105 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 105 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 18 | 17% |
| Researcher | 15 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 19 | 18% |
| Unknown | 23 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 28 | 27% |
| Neuroscience | 18 | 17% |
| Engineering | 8 | 8% |
| Psychology | 5 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 8 | 8% |
| Unknown | 35 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 March 2019.
All research outputs
#15,600,852
of 26,147,626 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
#3,559
of 5,637 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#196,374
of 369,942 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
#66
of 88 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,147,626 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,637 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 369,942 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 88 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.