↓ Skip to main content

Development and application of an indicator assessment tool for measuring health services accreditation programs

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Research Notes, August 2015
Altmetric Badge

Readers on

mendeley
72 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Development and application of an indicator assessment tool for measuring health services accreditation programs
Published in
BMC Research Notes, August 2015
DOI 10.1186/s13104-015-1330-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Virginia Mumford, David Greenfield, Anne Hogden, Deborah Debono, Kevin Forde, Johanna Westbrook, Jeffrey Braithwaite

Abstract

Hospital accreditation programs are internationally widespread and consume increasingly scarce health resources. However, we lack tools to consistently identify suitable indicators to assess and monitor accreditation outcomes. We describe the development and validation of such a tool. Using Australian accreditation standards as our reference point we: reviewed the research evidence for potential indicators; looked for links with existing external indicators; and assessed relevant state and federal policies. We allocated provisional scores, on a five point Likert scale, to the five accountability criteria in the tool: research; accuracy; proximity; no adverse effects; and specificity. An expert panel validated the use of the purpose designed indicator assessment tool. The panel identified hand hygiene compliance rates as a suitable process indicator, and hospital acquired Staphylococcus aureus infection (SAB) rates as an outcome indicator, with the hypothesis that improved hand hygiene compliance rates and lower SAB rates would correlate with accreditation performance. This new tool can be used to identify, analyse, and compare accreditation indicators. Using infection control indicators such as hand hygiene compliance and SAB rates to measure accreditation effectiveness has merit, and their efficacy can be determined by comparing accreditation scores with indicator outcomes. To verify the tool as a robust instrument, testing is needed in other health service domains, both in Australia and internationally. This tool provides health policy makers with an important means for assessing the accreditation programs which form a critical part of the national patient safety and quality framework.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 72 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 2 3%
Portugal 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
United Arab Emirates 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 65 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 12 17%
Researcher 9 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 13%
Other 5 7%
Professor 4 6%
Other 14 19%
Unknown 19 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 23 32%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 15%
Business, Management and Accounting 6 8%
Social Sciences 4 6%
Engineering 2 3%
Other 6 8%
Unknown 20 28%