You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
The occlusion tests and end-expiratory esophageal pressure: measurements and comparison in controlled and assisted ventilation
|
---|---|
Published in |
Annals of Intensive Care, February 2016
|
DOI | 10.1186/s13613-016-0112-1 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Davide Chiumello, Dario Consonni, Silvia Coppola, Sara Froio, Francesco Crimella, Andrea Colombo |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Mexico | 1 | 33% |
Uruguay | 1 | 33% |
Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 67% |
Members of the public | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 91 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Hungary | 1 | 1% |
Italy | 1 | 1% |
Brazil | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 88 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Other | 14 | 15% |
Student > Postgraduate | 12 | 13% |
Researcher | 11 | 12% |
Student > Master | 8 | 9% |
Student > Bachelor | 7 | 8% |
Other | 21 | 23% |
Unknown | 18 | 20% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 54 | 59% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 8% |
Engineering | 4 | 4% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 2% |
Environmental Science | 2 | 2% |
Other | 4 | 4% |
Unknown | 18 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 February 2024.
All research outputs
#2,529,793
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Intensive Care
#333
of 1,197 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,730
of 409,924 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Intensive Care
#5
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,197 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 409,924 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.