↓ Skip to main content

Laparoscopy versus laparotomy for the management of early stage endometrial cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (52nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
policy
1 policy source
twitter
3 X users
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
145 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
264 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Laparoscopy versus laparotomy for the management of early stage endometrial cancer
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2018
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006655.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Khadra Galaal, Hannah Donkers, Andrew Bryant, Alberto D Lopes

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 264 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 263 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 31 12%
Student > Bachelor 29 11%
Researcher 27 10%
Other 22 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 6%
Other 47 18%
Unknown 93 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 93 35%
Nursing and Health Professions 20 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 2%
Social Sciences 6 2%
Other 27 10%
Unknown 104 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 May 2022.
All research outputs
#2,144,464
of 25,372,398 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,513
of 12,220 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,772
of 333,490 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#104
of 217 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,372,398 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,220 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 37.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 333,490 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 217 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.