↓ Skip to main content

Laparoscopy versus laparotomy for the management of early stage endometrial cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
126 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Laparoscopy versus laparotomy for the management of early stage endometrial cancer
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2018
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006655.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Khadra Galaal, Hannah Donkers, Andrew Bryant, Alberto D Lopes

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 126 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Egypt 1 <1%
Unknown 123 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 23 18%
Researcher 19 15%
Unspecified 15 12%
Student > Bachelor 15 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 11%
Other 40 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 69 55%
Unspecified 20 16%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 6%
Social Sciences 5 4%
Other 17 13%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 February 2019.
All research outputs
#1,995,328
of 12,719,839 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,804
of 10,409 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,595
of 188,666 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#17
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,719,839 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,409 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 188,666 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.