↓ Skip to main content

Laparoscopy versus laparotomy for the management of early stage endometrial cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
1 tweeter
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
105 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Laparoscopy versus laparotomy for the management of early stage endometrial cancer
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2018
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006655.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Khadra Galaal, Hannah Donkers, Andrew Bryant, Alberto D Lopes

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 105 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 104 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 18 17%
Student > Master 17 16%
Student > Bachelor 14 13%
Other 9 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 8%
Other 24 23%
Unknown 15 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 53 50%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 5%
Social Sciences 4 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 4%
Other 5 5%
Unknown 23 22%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 August 2019.
All research outputs
#1,362,076
of 14,331,597 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,864
of 10,948 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,628
of 263,109 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#22
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,331,597 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,948 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 263,109 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.