You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Genetic Evidence of Tiger Population Structure and Migration within an Isolated and Fragmented Landscape in Northwest India
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, January 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0029827 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Patlolla Anuradha Reddy, Digpal Singh Gour, Maradani Bhavanishankar, Kanika Jaggi, Mohammed Hussain, Katakam Harika, Sisinthy Shivaji |
| Abstract |
Majority of the tiger habitat in Indian subcontinent lies within high human density landscapes and is highly sensitive to surrounding pressures. These forests are unable to sustain healthy tiger populations within a tiger-hostile matrix, despite considerable conservation efforts. Ranthambore Tiger Reserve (RTR) in Northwest India is one such isolated forest which is rapidly losing its links with other tiger territories in the Central Indian landscape. Non-invasive genetic sampling for individual identification is a potent technique to understand the relationships between threatened tiger populations in degraded habitats. This study is an attempt to establish tiger movement across a fragmented landscape between RTR and its neighboring forests, Kuno-Palpur Wildlife Sanctuary (KPWLS) and Madhav National Park (MNP) based on non-invasively obtained genetic data. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 167 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| India | 5 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| China | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 155 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 44 | 26% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 31 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 24 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 16 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 5% |
| Other | 25 | 15% |
| Unknown | 18 | 11% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 79 | 47% |
| Environmental Science | 44 | 26% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 9 | 5% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 4 | 2% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 9 | 5% |
| Unknown | 20 | 12% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 February 2014.
All research outputs
#2,443,905
of 22,661,413 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#31,272
of 193,502 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,836
of 243,373 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#395
of 3,220 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,661,413 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 193,502 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 243,373 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,220 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.