You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
A Roadmap to Reducing Child Poverty
|
---|---|
Published by |
The National Academies Press, February 2019
|
DOI | 10.17226/25246 |
Pubmed ID | |
ISBNs |
978-0-309-48398-8, 978-0-309-48396-4, 978-0-309-48397-1, 978-0-309-48395-7, 978-0-309-48399-5, 978-0-309-48400-8, 978-0-309-48402-2, 978-0-309-48401-5
|
Authors |
Greg Duncan and Suzanne Le Menestrel, Editors; Committee on Building an Agenda to Reduce the Number of Children in Poverty by Half in 10 Years; Board on Children, Youth, and Families; Committee on National Statistics; Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education; National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine, National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine |
Editors |
Greg Duncan, Suzanne Le Menestrel |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 810 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 462 | 57% |
United Kingdom | 18 | 2% |
Canada | 11 | 1% |
France | 4 | <1% |
Japan | 3 | <1% |
Australia | 3 | <1% |
Mexico | 3 | <1% |
Sweden | 2 | <1% |
Poland | 2 | <1% |
Other | 25 | 3% |
Unknown | 277 | 34% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 605 | 75% |
Scientists | 125 | 15% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 49 | 6% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 28 | 3% |
Unknown | 3 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 203 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 203 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 33 | 16% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 24 | 12% |
Student > Master | 24 | 12% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 16 | 8% |
Professor | 10 | 5% |
Other | 31 | 15% |
Unknown | 65 | 32% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Social Sciences | 49 | 24% |
Psychology | 18 | 9% |
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 12 | 6% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 11 | 5% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 5% |
Other | 28 | 14% |
Unknown | 75 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1917. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 April 2024.
All research outputs
#5,121
of 25,913,612 outputs
Outputs from The National Academies Press
#29
of 10,113 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#82
of 369,733 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The National Academies Press
#2
of 54 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,913,612 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,113 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 42.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 369,733 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 54 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.