↓ Skip to main content

SnugDock: Paratope Structural Optimization during Antibody-Antigen Docking Compensates for Errors in Antibody Homology Models

Overview of attention for article published in PLoS Computational Biology, January 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent
q&a
1 Q&A thread

Citations

dimensions_citation
143 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
220 Mendeley
citeulike
4 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
SnugDock: Paratope Structural Optimization during Antibody-Antigen Docking Compensates for Errors in Antibody Homology Models
Published in
PLoS Computational Biology, January 2010
DOI 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000644
Pubmed ID
Authors

Aroop Sircar, Jeffrey J. Gray

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 220 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 7 3%
United Kingdom 3 1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Argentina 1 <1%
Egypt 1 <1%
Unknown 204 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 62 28%
Student > Ph. D. Student 50 23%
Student > Bachelor 23 10%
Student > Master 19 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 5%
Other 27 12%
Unknown 28 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 68 31%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 47 21%
Chemistry 21 10%
Computer Science 12 5%
Engineering 10 5%
Other 30 14%
Unknown 32 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 July 2020.
All research outputs
#6,374,015
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from PLoS Computational Biology
#4,353
of 8,960 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,404
of 172,438 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS Computational Biology
#26
of 61 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,960 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 172,438 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 61 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.