You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A Flexible Alternative to the Cox Proportional Hazards Model for Assessing the Prognostic Accuracy of Hospice Patient Survival
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, October 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0047804 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Branko Miladinovic, Ambuj Kumar, Rahul Mhaskar, Sehwan Kim, Ronald Schonwetter, Benjamin Djulbegovic |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 63 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
| Japan | 1 | 2% |
| Australia | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 60 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 27% |
| Researcher | 11 | 17% |
| Other | 8 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 13% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 5 | 8% |
| Other | 8 | 13% |
| Unknown | 6 | 10% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 28 | 44% |
| Mathematics | 5 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 6% |
| Engineering | 3 | 5% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 13 | 21% |
| Unknown | 8 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 July 2012.
All research outputs
#12,946,234
of 22,849,304 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#101,226
of 194,892 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#90,963
of 175,644 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#2,118
of 4,762 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,849,304 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 194,892 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.1. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 175,644 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,762 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.