↓ Skip to main content

Renal Function Declines More in Tenofovir- than Abacavir-Based Antiretroviral Therapy in Low-Body Weight Treatment-Naïve Patients with HIV Infection

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
59 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
47 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Renal Function Declines More in Tenofovir- than Abacavir-Based Antiretroviral Therapy in Low-Body Weight Treatment-Naïve Patients with HIV Infection
Published in
PLOS ONE, January 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0029977
Pubmed ID
Authors

Takeshi Nishijima, Hiroyuki Gatanaga, Hirokazu Komatsu, Kunihisa Tsukada, Takuro Shimbo, Takahiro Aoki, Koji Watanabe, Ei Kinai, Haruhito Honda, Junko Tanuma, Hirohisa Yazaki, Miwako Honda, Katsuji Teruya, Yoshimi Kikuchi, Shinichi Oka

Abstract

To compare the rate of decline of renal function in tenofovir- and abacavir-based antiretroviral therapy (ART) in low-body weight treatment-naïve patients with HIV infection.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Mexico 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Australia 1 2%
Unknown 44 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 8 17%
Researcher 7 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 9%
Professor 4 9%
Student > Postgraduate 4 9%
Other 11 23%
Unknown 9 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 21 45%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 6%
Mathematics 2 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 4%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 14 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 October 2018.
All research outputs
#7,254,867
of 22,919,505 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#86,287
of 195,392 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#68,058
of 244,279 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#1,032
of 3,051 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,919,505 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 195,392 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 244,279 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,051 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.