↓ Skip to main content

Decision-making in the practice of female genital mutilation or cutting in Sudan: a cross-sectional study

Overview of attention for article published in Global Health Research and Policy, February 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (54th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
66 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Decision-making in the practice of female genital mutilation or cutting in Sudan: a cross-sectional study
Published in
Global Health Research and Policy, February 2019
DOI 10.1186/s41256-019-0096-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Majdi M. Sabahelzain, Ahmed Gamal Eldin, Suad Babiker, Caroline W. Kabiru, Muna Eltayeb

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 66 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 66 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 11 17%
Student > Bachelor 7 11%
Researcher 6 9%
Other 5 8%
Unspecified 3 5%
Other 13 20%
Unknown 21 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 20%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 14%
Social Sciences 7 11%
Psychology 4 6%
Unspecified 3 5%
Other 6 9%
Unknown 24 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 August 2019.
All research outputs
#7,585,435
of 23,132,033 outputs
Outputs from Global Health Research and Policy
#118
of 200 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#142,954
of 353,523 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Global Health Research and Policy
#5
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,132,033 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 200 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.7. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,523 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.