↓ Skip to main content

Positive end-expiratory pressure for preterm infants requiring conventional mechanical ventilation for respiratory distress syndrome or bronchopulmonary dysplasia

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
48 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
97 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Positive end-expiratory pressure for preterm infants requiring conventional mechanical ventilation for respiratory distress syndrome or bronchopulmonary dysplasia
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004500.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nicolas Bamat, Julie Fierro, Yifei Wang, David Millar, Haresh Kirpalani

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 48 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 97 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 97 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 24 25%
Researcher 13 13%
Student > Master 11 11%
Other 5 5%
Student > Postgraduate 5 5%
Other 14 14%
Unknown 25 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 40 41%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 12%
Social Sciences 4 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 2%
Computer Science 2 2%
Other 5 5%
Unknown 32 33%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 31. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 September 2019.
All research outputs
#742,244
of 16,327,556 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,968
of 11,472 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,820
of 271,456 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#14
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,327,556 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,472 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 271,456 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.