You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Self-management of health care behaviors for COPD: a systematic review and meta-analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, February 2016
|
| DOI | 10.2147/copd.s90812 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kate Jolly, Saimma Majothi, Alice J Sitch, Nicola R Heneghan, Richard D Riley, David J Moore, Elizabeth J Bates, Alice M Turner, Susan E Bayliss, Malcolm J Price, Sally J Singh, Peymane Adab, David A Fitzmaurice, Rachel E Jordan |
| Abstract |
This systematic review aimed to identify the most effective components of interventions to facilitate self-management of health care behaviors for patients with COPD. PROSPERO registration number CRD42011001588. We used standard review methods with a systematic search to May 2012 for randomized controlled trials of self-management interventions reporting hospital admissions or health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Mean differences (MD), hazard ratios, and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated and pooled using random-effects meta-analyses. Effects among different subgroups of interventions were explored including single/multiple components and multicomponent interventions with/without exercise. One hundred and seventy-three randomized controlled trials were identified. Self-management interventions had a minimal effect on hospital admission rates. Multicomponent interventions improved HRQoL (studies with follow-up >6 months St George's Respiratory Questionnaire (MD 2.40, 95% CI 0.75-4.04, I (2) 57.9). Exercise was an effective individual component (St George's Respiratory Questionnaire at 3 months MD 4.87, 95% CI 3.96-5.79, I (2) 0%). While many self-management interventions increased HRQoL, little effect was seen on hospital admissions. More trials should report admissions and follow-up participants beyond the end of the intervention. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 116 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 115 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 16 | 14% |
| Researcher | 11 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 9 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 18 | 16% |
| Unknown | 40 | 34% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 24 | 21% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 21 | 18% |
| Social Sciences | 7 | 6% |
| Psychology | 4 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 11 | 9% |
| Unknown | 46 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 November 2018.
All research outputs
#7,611,473
of 26,080,956 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
#890
of 2,609 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#112,990
of 409,574 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
#31
of 65 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,080,956 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,609 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 409,574 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 65 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.