You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
A Selectable and Excisable Marker System for the Rapid Creation of Recombinant Poxviruses
|
---|---|
Published in |
PLOS ONE, September 2011
|
DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0024643 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Julia L. Rintoul, Jiahu Wang, Don B. Gammon, Nicholas J. van Buuren, Kenneth Garson, Karen Jardine, Michele Barry, David H. Evans, John C. Bell |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Mexico | 1 | 3% |
United States | 1 | 3% |
Australia | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 35 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 21% |
Researcher | 8 | 21% |
Student > Master | 5 | 13% |
Student > Bachelor | 3 | 8% |
Other | 2 | 5% |
Other | 6 | 16% |
Unknown | 6 | 16% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 11 | 29% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 6 | 16% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 13% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 11% |
Engineering | 2 | 5% |
Other | 2 | 5% |
Unknown | 8 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 October 2023.
All research outputs
#8,282,983
of 24,784,213 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#107,664
of 214,542 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,956
of 129,775 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#1,088
of 2,559 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,784,213 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 214,542 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.6. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 129,775 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2,559 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.