↓ Skip to main content

Protein Docking by the Underestimation of Free Energy Funnels in the Space of Encounter Complexes

Overview of attention for article published in PLoS Computational Biology, October 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
41 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
49 Mendeley
citeulike
6 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Protein Docking by the Underestimation of Free Energy Funnels in the Space of Encounter Complexes
Published in
PLoS Computational Biology, October 2008
DOI 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000191
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yang Shen, Ioannis Ch. Paschalidis, Pirooz Vakili, Sandor Vajda

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 6%
Korea, Republic of 1 2%
Denmark 1 2%
Canada 1 2%
Japan 1 2%
China 1 2%
Unknown 41 84%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 35%
Researcher 13 27%
Other 5 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 6%
Student > Master 3 6%
Other 7 14%
Unknown 1 2%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 21 43%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 16%
Chemistry 6 12%
Computer Science 6 12%
Engineering 2 4%
Other 3 6%
Unknown 3 6%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 January 2010.
All research outputs
#6,491,045
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from PLoS Computational Biology
#4,451
of 8,960 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,507
of 102,974 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS Computational Biology
#18
of 51 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,960 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 102,974 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 51 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.