↓ Skip to main content

Fractional flow reserve-guided complete revascularization versus culprit-only revascularization in acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and multi-vessel disease patients: a meta-analysis…

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Cardiovascular Disorders, March 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
42 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Fractional flow reserve-guided complete revascularization versus culprit-only revascularization in acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and multi-vessel disease patients: a meta-analysis and systematic review
Published in
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders, March 2019
DOI 10.1186/s12872-019-1022-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Li-jie Wang, Shuo Han, Xiao-Hong Zhang, Yuan-Zhe Jin

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 42 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 10%
Other 4 10%
Student > Master 3 7%
Student > Postgraduate 2 5%
Lecturer 1 2%
Other 5 12%
Unknown 23 55%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 29%
Engineering 2 5%
Unspecified 1 2%
Physics and Astronomy 1 2%
Environmental Science 1 2%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 23 55%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 March 2019.
All research outputs
#15,035,034
of 23,132,033 outputs
Outputs from BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
#765
of 1,654 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#210,427
of 354,050 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
#12
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,132,033 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,654 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 354,050 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.