↓ Skip to main content

Real Virtuality: A Code of Ethical Conduct. Recommendations for Good Scientific Practice and the Consumers of VR-Technology

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Robotics and AI, February 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#5 of 1,806)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
40 news outlets
blogs
6 blogs
policy
3 policy sources
twitter
305 X users
facebook
8 Facebook pages
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
8 Google+ users
reddit
5 Redditors

Citations

dimensions_citation
292 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
357 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Real Virtuality: A Code of Ethical Conduct. Recommendations for Good Scientific Practice and the Consumers of VR-Technology
Published in
Frontiers in Robotics and AI, February 2016
DOI 10.3389/frobt.2016.00003
Authors

Michael Madary, Thomas K. Metzinger

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 305 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 357 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 356 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 52 15%
Researcher 48 13%
Student > Master 44 12%
Student > Bachelor 39 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 20 6%
Other 60 17%
Unknown 94 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 51 14%
Psychology 51 14%
Social Sciences 27 8%
Arts and Humanities 24 7%
Engineering 18 5%
Other 75 21%
Unknown 111 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 617. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 November 2023.
All research outputs
#38,028
of 26,166,431 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Robotics and AI
#5
of 1,806 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#583
of 313,689 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Robotics and AI
#1
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,166,431 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,806 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 313,689 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.