You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Dynamics and Mechanical Stability of the Developing Dorsoventral Organizer of the Wing Imaginal Disc
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLoS Computational Biology, September 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002153 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Oriol Canela-Xandri, Francesc Sagués, Jaume Casademunt, Javier Buceta |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 3% |
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| France | 1 | 2% |
| Canada | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 55 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 30% |
| Researcher | 12 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 8% |
| Professor | 4 | 7% |
| Other | 6 | 10% |
| Unknown | 7 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 26 | 43% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 12 | 20% |
| Mathematics | 4 | 7% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 5% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 4 | 7% |
| Unknown | 9 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 April 2017.
All research outputs
#15,455,365
of 25,806,080 outputs
Outputs from PLoS Computational Biology
#6,595
of 9,043 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#92,550
of 144,419 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS Computational Biology
#69
of 120 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,806,080 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,043 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.4. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 144,419 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 120 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.