You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Twitter Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Microbial abundance, activity and population genomic profiling with mOTUs2
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Communications, March 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41467-019-08844-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Alessio Milanese, Daniel R Mende, Lucas Paoli, Guillem Salazar, Hans-Joachim Ruscheweyh, Miguelangel Cuenca, Pascal Hingamp, Renato Alves, Paul I Costea, Luis Pedro Coelho, Thomas S. B. Schmidt, Alexandre Almeida, Alex L Mitchell, Robert D. Finn, Jaime Huerta-Cepas, Peer Bork, Georg Zeller, Shinichi Sunagawa |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 133 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 22 | 17% |
| Germany | 9 | 7% |
| United Kingdom | 8 | 6% |
| France | 7 | 5% |
| Switzerland | 6 | 5% |
| Australia | 4 | 3% |
| Netherlands | 4 | 3% |
| Sweden | 4 | 3% |
| Spain | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 28 | 21% |
| Unknown | 38 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 70 | 53% |
| Members of the public | 55 | 41% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 5% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 474 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 474 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 104 | 22% |
| Researcher | 92 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 63 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 37 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 23 | 5% |
| Other | 65 | 14% |
| Unknown | 90 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 109 | 23% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 108 | 23% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 32 | 7% |
| Environmental Science | 31 | 7% |
| Computer Science | 25 | 5% |
| Other | 54 | 11% |
| Unknown | 115 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 87. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 February 2023.
All research outputs
#461,067
of 24,535,155 outputs
Outputs from Nature Communications
#7,811
of 52,834 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,934
of 358,672 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Communications
#225
of 1,425 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,535,155 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 52,834 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 56.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 358,672 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,425 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.