↓ Skip to main content

Russian nuclear forces, 2019

Overview of attention for article published in Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, March 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
75 tweeters
Title
Russian nuclear forces, 2019
Published in
Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, March 2019
DOI 10.1080/00963402.2019.1580891
Authors

Hans M. Kristensen, Matt Korda

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 75 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 56. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 March 2019.
All research outputs
#271,283
of 12,680,451 outputs
Outputs from Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists
#67
of 637 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,963
of 161,158 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,680,451 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 637 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 161,158 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them