↓ Skip to main content

Taxonomic status of the Australian dingo: the case for Canis dingo Meyer, 1793

Overview of attention for article published in ZOOTAXA, March 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#12 of 10,837)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
17 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
twitter
62 tweeters
facebook
4 Facebook pages
video
1 video uploader

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
33 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Taxonomic status of the Australian dingo: the case for Canis dingo Meyer, 1793
Published in
ZOOTAXA, March 2019
DOI 10.11646/zootaxa.4564.1.6
Pubmed ID
Authors

BRADLEY P. SMITH, KYLIE M. CAIRNS, JUSTIN W. ADAMS, THOMAS M. NEWSOME, MELANIE FILLIOS, ELOÏSE C. DÉAUX, WILLIAM C. H. PARR, MIKE LETNIC, LILY M. VAN EEDEN, ROBERT G. APPLEBY, COREY J. A. BRADSHAW, PETER SAVOLAINEN, EUAN G. RITCHIE, DALE G. NIMMO, CLARE ARCHER-LEAN, AARON C. GREENVILLE, CHRISTOPHER R. DICKMAN, LYN WATSON, KATHERINE E. MOSEBY, TIM S. DOHERTY, ARIAN D. WALLACH, DAMIAN S. MORRANT, MATHEW S. CROWTHER

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 62 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 33 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 8 24%
Researcher 6 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 15%
Other 4 12%
Student > Master 2 6%
Other 5 15%
Unknown 3 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 42%
Environmental Science 9 27%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Arts and Humanities 1 3%
Philosophy 1 3%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 5 15%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 198. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 May 2020.
All research outputs
#83,682
of 15,121,911 outputs
Outputs from ZOOTAXA
#12
of 10,837 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,729
of 266,368 outputs
Outputs of similar age from ZOOTAXA
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,121,911 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,837 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 266,368 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them