↓ Skip to main content

Taxonomic status of the Australian dingo: the case for Canis dingo Meyer, 1793

Overview of attention for article published in ZOOTAXA, March 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
21 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
twitter
56 X users
facebook
4 Facebook pages
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
48 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
72 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Taxonomic status of the Australian dingo: the case for Canis dingo Meyer, 1793
Published in
ZOOTAXA, March 2019
DOI 10.11646/zootaxa.4564.1.6
Pubmed ID
Authors

BRADLEY P. SMITH, KYLIE M. CAIRNS, JUSTIN W. ADAMS, THOMAS M. NEWSOME, MELANIE FILLIOS, ELOÏSE C. DÉAUX, WILLIAM C. H. PARR, MIKE LETNIC, LILY M. VAN EEDEN, ROBERT G. APPLEBY, COREY J. A. BRADSHAW, PETER SAVOLAINEN, EUAN G. RITCHIE, DALE G. NIMMO, CLARE ARCHER-LEAN, AARON C. GREENVILLE, CHRISTOPHER R. DICKMAN, LYN WATSON, KATHERINE E. MOSEBY, TIM S. DOHERTY, ARIAN D. WALLACH, DAMIAN S. MORRANT, MATHEW S. CROWTHER

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 56 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 72 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 72 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 11 15%
Researcher 10 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 10%
Other 6 8%
Student > Master 5 7%
Other 10 14%
Unknown 23 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 24 33%
Environmental Science 14 19%
Arts and Humanities 4 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 3%
Linguistics 1 1%
Other 3 4%
Unknown 24 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 225. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 October 2023.
All research outputs
#177,355
of 26,099,501 outputs
Outputs from ZOOTAXA
#102
of 17,877 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,777
of 370,584 outputs
Outputs of similar age from ZOOTAXA
#1
of 580 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,099,501 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 17,877 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 370,584 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 580 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.