↓ Skip to main content

Atropine therapy versus no atropine therapy for the prevention of adverse events in paediatric patients undergoing intubation

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Atropine therapy versus no atropine therapy for the prevention of adverse events in paediatric patients undergoing intubation
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2018
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd010898.pub2
Authors

Ashlea R Wilmott, Graham C Thompson, Eddy Lang, Susan Powelson, Abel Wakai, Ben Vandermeer, Ronan O'Sullivan

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 1 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Librarian 1 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 1 100%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 January 2020.
All research outputs
#9,006,895
of 14,346,974 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9,271
of 10,948 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#158,171
of 263,450 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#25
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,346,974 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,948 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.8. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 263,450 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.