You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Hearing Loss in a Mouse Model of 22q11.2 Deletion Syndrome
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, November 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0080104 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jennifer C. Fuchs, Fhatarah A. Zinnamon, Ruth R. Taylor, Sarah Ivins, Peter J. Scambler, Andrew Forge, Abigail S. Tucker, Jennifer F. Linden |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 90 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 2% |
| Portugal | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 87 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 19 | 21% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 20% |
| Researcher | 12 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 10 | 11% |
| Unknown | 14 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 27 | 30% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 11 | 12% |
| Neuroscience | 10 | 11% |
| Psychology | 9 | 10% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 7% |
| Other | 11 | 12% |
| Unknown | 16 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 April 2022.
All research outputs
#18,936,243
of 23,466,057 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#161,091
of 200,902 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#159,723
of 214,017 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#3,874
of 5,156 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,466,057 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 200,902 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.3. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 214,017 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5,156 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.