↓ Skip to main content

DYRK1A, a Novel Determinant of the Methionine-Homocysteine Cycle in Different Mouse Models Overexpressing this Down-Syndrome-Associated Kinase

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, October 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
1 patent
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
46 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
57 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
DYRK1A, a Novel Determinant of the Methionine-Homocysteine Cycle in Different Mouse Models Overexpressing this Down-Syndrome-Associated Kinase
Published in
PLOS ONE, October 2009
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0007540
Pubmed ID
Authors

Christophe Noll, Chris Planque, Clémentine Ripoll, Fayçal Guedj, Anna Diez, Véronique Ducros, Nicole Belin, Arnaud Duchon, Jean-Louis Paul, Anne Badel, Bénédicte de Freminville, Yann Grattau, Henri Bléhaut, Yann Herault, Nathalie Janel, Jean-Maurice Delabar

Abstract

Hyperhomocysteinemia, characterized by increased plasma homocysteine level, is associated with an increased risk of atherosclerosis. On the contrary, patients with Down syndrome appear to be protected from the development of atherosclerosis. We previously found a deleterious effect of hyperhomocysteinemia on expression of DYRK1A, a Down-syndrome-associated kinase. As increased expression of DYRK1A and low plasma homocysteine level have been associated with Down syndrome, we aimed to analyze the effect of its over-expression on homocysteine metabolism in mice.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 2%
France 1 2%
Unknown 55 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 15 26%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 16%
Student > Master 6 11%
Student > Bachelor 4 7%
Other 4 7%
Other 9 16%
Unknown 10 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 17 30%
Neuroscience 7 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 12%
Psychology 4 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 7%
Other 7 12%
Unknown 11 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 October 2015.
All research outputs
#4,076,685
of 22,661,413 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#57,689
of 193,502 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,091
of 93,646 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#154
of 547 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,661,413 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 193,502 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 93,646 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 547 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.