You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Human impact erodes chimpanzee behavioral diversity
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Science, March 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1126/science.aau4532 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Hjalmar S Kühl, Christophe Boesch, Lars Kulik, Fabian Haas, Mimi Arandjelovic, Paula Dieguez, Gaëlle Bocksberger, Mary Brooke McElreath, Anthony Agbor, Samuel Angedakin, Emmanuel Ayuk Ayimisin, Emma Bailey, Donatienne Barubiyo, Mattia Bessone, Gregory Brazzola, Rebecca Chancellor, Heather Cohen, Charlotte Coupland, Emmanuel Danquah, Tobias Deschner, Dervla Dowd, Andrew Dunn, Villard Ebot Egbe, Henk Eshuis, Annemarie Goedmakers, Anne-Céline Granjon, Josephine Head, Daniela Hedwig, Veerle Hermans, Inaoyom Imong, Kathryn J Jeffery, Sorrel Jones, Jessica Junker, Parag Kadam, Mbangi Kambere, Mohamed Kambi, Ivonne Kienast, Deo Kujirakwinja, Kevin E Langergraber, Juan Lapuente, Bradley Larson, Kevin Lee, Vera Leinert, Manuel Llana, Giovanna Maretti, Sergio Marrocoli, Rumen Martin, Tanyi Julius Mbi, Amelia C Meier, Bethan Morgan, David Morgan, Felix Mulindahabi, Mizuki Murai, Emily Neil, Protais Niyigaba, Lucy Jayne Ormsby, Robinson Orume, Liliana Pacheco, Alex Piel, Jodie Preece, Sebastien Regnaut, Aaron Rundus, Crickette Sanz, Joost van Schijndel, Volker Sommer, Fiona Stewart, Nikki Tagg, Elleni Vendras, Virginie Vergnes, Adam Welsh, Erin G Wessling, Jacob Willie, Roman M Wittig, Yisa Ginath Yuh, Kyle Yurkiw, Klaus Zuberbühler, Ammie K Kalan |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 273 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 40 | 15% |
| United Kingdom | 30 | 11% |
| Spain | 20 | 7% |
| Germany | 15 | 5% |
| Canada | 7 | 3% |
| Netherlands | 4 | 1% |
| Japan | 4 | 1% |
| Australia | 4 | 1% |
| Brazil | 4 | 1% |
| Other | 33 | 12% |
| Unknown | 112 | 41% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 180 | 66% |
| Scientists | 65 | 24% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 21 | 8% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 7 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 289 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 289 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 47 | 16% |
| Researcher | 42 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 31 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 28 | 10% |
| Professor | 15 | 5% |
| Other | 51 | 18% |
| Unknown | 75 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 85 | 29% |
| Environmental Science | 33 | 11% |
| Psychology | 15 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 13 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 10 | 3% |
| Other | 48 | 17% |
| Unknown | 85 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1292. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 June 2023.
All research outputs
#10,611
of 25,928,676 outputs
Outputs from Science
#551
of 83,454 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#192
of 368,242 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science
#14
of 1,223 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,928,676 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 83,454 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 66.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 368,242 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,223 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.