↓ Skip to main content

Outpatient versus inpatient treatment for acute pulmonary embolism

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
6 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
130 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Outpatient versus inpatient treatment for acute pulmonary embolism
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd010019.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hugo HB Yoo, Vania Santos Nunes-Nogueira, Paulo J Fortes Villas Boas, Cathryn Broderick

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 130 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 130 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 22 17%
Student > Bachelor 17 13%
Student > Postgraduate 14 11%
Researcher 14 11%
Other 10 8%
Other 23 18%
Unknown 30 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 51 39%
Nursing and Health Professions 23 18%
Psychology 4 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 2%
Social Sciences 2 2%
Other 10 8%
Unknown 37 28%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 March 2020.
All research outputs
#3,062,466
of 17,373,814 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,746
of 11,662 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#70,714
of 274,825 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#22
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,373,814 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,662 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 274,825 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.