↓ Skip to main content

Outpatient versus inpatient treatment for acute pulmonary embolism

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
72 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Outpatient versus inpatient treatment for acute pulmonary embolism
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd010019.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hugo HB Yoo, Vania Santos Nunes-Nogueira, Paulo J Fortes Villas Boas, Cathryn Broderick

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 72 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 72 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 12 17%
Student > Bachelor 11 15%
Other 8 11%
Researcher 7 10%
Student > Postgraduate 6 8%
Other 12 17%
Unknown 16 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 34 47%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 3%
Social Sciences 2 3%
Other 2 3%
Unknown 22 31%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 March 2020.
All research outputs
#3,636,486
of 14,509,999 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,321
of 10,989 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#86,834
of 264,719 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#22
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,509,999 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,989 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.1. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,719 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.