↓ Skip to main content

Outpatient versus inpatient treatment for acute pulmonary embolism

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
59 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Outpatient versus inpatient treatment for acute pulmonary embolism
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2019
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd010019.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hugo HB Yoo, Vania Santos Nunes-Nogueira, Paulo J Fortes Villas Boas, Cathryn Broderick

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
Unknown 58 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 12 20%
Student > Master 12 20%
Researcher 6 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 10%
Student > Bachelor 6 10%
Other 17 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 29 49%
Unspecified 13 22%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 8%
Psychology 4 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 5%
Other 5 8%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 May 2019.
All research outputs
#3,248,083
of 13,145,341 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,994
of 10,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#83,781
of 251,179 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#20
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,145,341 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.6. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 251,179 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.