↓ Skip to main content

N-acetylglucosamine 6-Phosphate Deacetylase (nagA) Is Required for N-acetyl Glucosamine Assimilation in Gluconacetobacter xylinus

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, June 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
38 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
72 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
N-acetylglucosamine 6-Phosphate Deacetylase (nagA) Is Required for N-acetyl Glucosamine Assimilation in Gluconacetobacter xylinus
Published in
PLOS ONE, June 2011
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0018099
Pubmed ID
Authors

Vikas Yadav, Bruce Panilaitis, Hai Shi, Keiji Numuta, Kyongbum Lee, David L. Kaplan

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 72 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Denmark 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 70 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 21%
Researcher 12 17%
Student > Bachelor 11 15%
Student > Master 7 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 8%
Other 8 11%
Unknown 13 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 23 32%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 13 18%
Chemistry 6 8%
Engineering 5 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 4%
Other 6 8%
Unknown 16 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 March 2019.
All research outputs
#7,585,824
of 23,132,033 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#91,387
of 197,452 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,110
of 112,078 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#793
of 1,723 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,132,033 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 197,452 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.2. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 112,078 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,723 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.