↓ Skip to main content

Neurofeedback and biofeedback with 37 migraineurs: a clinical outcome study

Overview of attention for article published in Behavioral and Brain Functions, January 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#29 of 378)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
23 tweeters
facebook
12 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
42 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
164 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Neurofeedback and biofeedback with 37 migraineurs: a clinical outcome study
Published in
Behavioral and Brain Functions, January 2010
DOI 10.1186/1744-9081-6-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Deborah A Stokes, Martha S Lappin

Abstract

Traditional peripheral biofeedback has grade A evidence for effectively treating migraines. Two newer forms of neurobiofeedback, EEG biofeedback and hemoencephalography biofeedback were combined with thermal handwarming biofeedback to treat 37 migraineurs in a clinical outpatient setting.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 164 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 1%
Netherlands 2 1%
Australia 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Russia 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 153 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 31 19%
Student > Master 30 18%
Researcher 21 13%
Student > Bachelor 20 12%
Other 14 9%
Other 30 18%
Unknown 18 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 50 30%
Medicine and Dentistry 30 18%
Neuroscience 15 9%
Engineering 13 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 7%
Other 24 15%
Unknown 21 13%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 September 2020.
All research outputs
#889,977
of 15,888,116 outputs
Outputs from Behavioral and Brain Functions
#29
of 378 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,110
of 219,568 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Behavioral and Brain Functions
#3
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,888,116 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 378 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 219,568 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.