↓ Skip to main content

Gaze fixation improves the stability of expert juggling

Overview of attention for article published in Experimental Brain Research, December 2011
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
96 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Gaze fixation improves the stability of expert juggling
Published in
Experimental Brain Research, December 2011
DOI 10.1007/s00221-011-2967-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Joost C. Dessing, Frédéric P. Rey, Peter J. Beek

Abstract

Novice and expert jugglers employ different visuomotor strategies: whereas novices look at the balls around their zeniths, experts tend to fixate their gaze at a central location within the pattern (so-called gaze-through). A gaze-through strategy may reflect visuomotor parsimony, i.e., the use of simpler visuomotor (oculomotor and/or attentional) strategies as afforded by superior tossing accuracy and error corrections. In addition, the more stable gaze during a gaze-through strategy may result in more accurate movement planning by providing a stable base for gaze-centered neural coding of ball motion and movement plans or for shifts in attention. To determine whether a stable gaze might indeed have such beneficial effects on juggling, we examined juggling variability during 3-ball cascade juggling with and without constrained gaze fixation (at various depths) in expert performers (n = 5). Novice jugglers were included (n = 5) for comparison, even though our predictions pertained specifically to expert juggling. We indeed observed that experts, but not novices, juggled significantly less variable when fixating, compared to unconstrained viewing. Thus, while visuomotor parsimony might still contribute to the emergence of a gaze-through strategy, this study highlights an additional role for improved movement planning. This role may be engendered by gaze-centered coding and/or attentional control mechanisms in the brain.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 96 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 1 1%
Romania 1 1%
Belgium 1 1%
Unknown 93 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 26%
Researcher 11 11%
Student > Bachelor 11 11%
Student > Master 10 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 9%
Other 17 18%
Unknown 13 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 30 31%
Sports and Recreations 13 14%
Neuroscience 11 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 9%
Social Sciences 7 7%
Other 14 15%
Unknown 12 13%