↓ Skip to main content

Don’t Quote me: Effects of Named, Quoted, and Partisan News Sources

Overview of attention for article published in Journalism Practice, March 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
10 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
Title
Don’t Quote me: Effects of Named, Quoted, and Partisan News Sources
Published in
Journalism Practice, March 2019
DOI 10.1080/17512786.2019.1588148
Authors

Megan Duncan, Kathleen Bartzen Culver, Douglas McLeod, Christopher Kremmer

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 2 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 100%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Arts and Humanities 2 100%
Social Sciences 1 50%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 March 2019.
All research outputs
#1,049,601
of 12,969,275 outputs
Outputs from Journalism Practice
#60
of 464 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,042
of 247,139 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journalism Practice
#7
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,969,275 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 464 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 247,139 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.