↓ Skip to main content

Inequity in consumption of goods and services adds to racial–ethnic disparities in air pollution exposure

Overview of attention for article published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, March 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
39 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
258 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Inequity in consumption of goods and services adds to racial–ethnic disparities in air pollution exposure
Published in
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, March 2019
DOI 10.1073/pnas.1818859116
Pubmed ID
Authors

Christopher W. Tessum, Joshua S. Apte, Andrew L. Goodkind, Nicholas Z. Muller, Kimberley A. Mullins, David A. Paolella, Stephen Polasky, Nathaniel P. Springer, Sumil K. Thakrar, Julian D. Marshall, Jason D. Hill

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 1,099 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 258 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 258 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 58 22%
Researcher 48 19%
Student > Master 38 15%
Student > Bachelor 19 7%
Professor 18 7%
Other 48 19%
Unknown 29 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 55 21%
Social Sciences 34 13%
Engineering 20 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 4%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 4%
Other 60 23%
Unknown 67 26%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1920. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 September 2020.
All research outputs
#1,803
of 15,924,550 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#77
of 86,205 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55
of 269,787 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#3
of 1,061 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,924,550 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 86,205 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 28.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 269,787 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,061 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.