You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Guidance to 2018 good practice: ARIA digitally-enabled, integrated, person-centred care for rhinitis and asthma
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical and Translational Allergy, March 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13601-019-0252-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
J. Bousquet, A. Bedbrook, W. Czarlewski, G. L. Onorato, S. Arnavielhe, D. Laune, E. Mathieu-Dupas, J. Fonseca, E. Costa, O. Lourenço, M. Morais-Almeida, A. Todo-Bom, M. Illario, E. Menditto, G. W. Canonica, L. Cecchi, R. Monti, L. Napoli, M. T. Ventura, G. De Feo, W. J. Fokkens, N. H. Chavannes, S. Reitsma, A. A. Cruz, J. da Silva, F. S. Serpa, D. Larenas-Linnemann, J. M. Fuentes Perez, Y. R. Huerta-Villalobos, D. Rivero-Yeverino, E. Rodriguez-Zagal, A. Valiulis, R. Dubakiene, R. Emuzyte, V. Kvedariene, I. Annesi-Maesano, H. Blain, P. Bonniaud, I. Bosse, Y. Dauvilliers, P. Devillier, J. F. Fontaine, J. L. Pépin, N. Pham-Thi, F. Portejoie, R. Picard, N. Roche, C. Rolland, P. Schmidt-Grendelmeier, P. Kuna, B. Samolinski, J. M. Anto, V. Cardona, J. Mullol, H. Pinnock, D. Ryan, A. Sheikh, S. Walker, S. Williams, S. Becker, L. Klimek, O. Pfaar, K. C. Bergmann, R. Mösges, T. Zuberbier, R. E. Roller-Wirnsberger, P. V. Tomazic, T. Haahtela, J. Salimäki, S. Toppila-Salmi, E. Valovirta, T. Vasankari, B. Gemicioğlu, A. Yorgancioglu, N. G. Papadopoulos, E. P. Prokopakis, I. G. Tsiligianni, S. Bosnic-Anticevich, R. O’Hehir, J. C. Ivancevich, H. Neffen, M. E. Zernotti, I. Kull, E. Melén, M. Wickman, C. Bachert, P. W. Hellings, G. Brusselle, S. Palkonen, C. Bindslev-Jensen, E. Eller, S. Waserman, L. P. Boulet, J. Bouchard, D. K. Chu, H. J. Schünemann, M. Sova, G. De Vries, M. van Eerd, I. Agache, I. J. Ansotegui, M. Bewick, T. Casale, M. Dykewick, M. Ebisawa, R. Murray, R. Naclerio, Y. Okamoto, D. V. Wallace |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 4 | 33% |
| Finland | 1 | 8% |
| Argentina | 1 | 8% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 5 | 42% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 67% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 17% |
| Scientists | 1 | 8% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 339 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 339 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 35 | 10% |
| Professor | 33 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 29 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 26 | 8% |
| Other | 20 | 6% |
| Other | 70 | 21% |
| Unknown | 126 | 37% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 80 | 24% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 14 | 4% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 12 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 12 | 4% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 9 | 3% |
| Other | 58 | 17% |
| Unknown | 154 | 45% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 November 2019.
All research outputs
#5,667,050
of 23,133,982 outputs
Outputs from Clinical and Translational Allergy
#314
of 673 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#106,328
of 351,385 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical and Translational Allergy
#8
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,133,982 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 673 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 351,385 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.