You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Evidence-based practice profiles of physiotherapists transitioning into the workforce: a study of two cohorts
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Medical Education, November 2011
|
DOI | 10.1186/1472-6920-11-100 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Maureen P McEvoy, Marie T Williams, Timothy S Olds, Lucy K Lewis, John Petkov |
Abstract |
Training in the five steps of evidence-based practice (EBP) has been recommended for inclusion in entry-level health professional training. The effectiveness of EBP education has been explored predominantly in the medical and nursing professions and more commonly in post-graduate than entry-level students. Few studies have investigated longitudinal changes in EBP attitudes and behaviours. This study aimed to assess the changes in EBP knowledge, attitudes and behaviours in entry-level physiotherapy students transitioning into the workforce. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Australia | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 1 | 50% |
Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 89 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | 2% |
France | 1 | 1% |
Indonesia | 1 | 1% |
Spain | 1 | 1% |
South Africa | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 83 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 16 | 18% |
Student > Master | 15 | 17% |
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 6 | 7% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 6 | 7% |
Researcher | 5 | 6% |
Other | 18 | 20% |
Unknown | 23 | 26% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Nursing and Health Professions | 25 | 28% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 18 | 20% |
Social Sciences | 6 | 7% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 3% |
Psychology | 2 | 2% |
Other | 6 | 7% |
Unknown | 29 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 January 2012.
All research outputs
#14,597,188
of 22,661,413 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Education
#2,112
of 3,291 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#157,651
of 240,152 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Education
#14
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,661,413 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,291 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 240,152 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.