↓ Skip to main content

Modeling durophagous predation and mortality rates from the fossil record of gastropods

Overview of attention for article published in Paleobiology, March 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
12 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
Title
Modeling durophagous predation and mortality rates from the fossil record of gastropods
Published in
Paleobiology, March 2019
DOI 10.1017/pab.2019.2
Authors

Graham E. Budd, Richard P. Mann

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 2 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 50%
Researcher 1 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Mathematics 1 50%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 50%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 September 2019.
All research outputs
#2,134,453
of 13,533,907 outputs
Outputs from Paleobiology
#126
of 540 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#62,894
of 254,214 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Paleobiology
#10
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,533,907 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 540 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 254,214 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.