You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Phototrophic purple bacteria as optoacoustic in vivo reporters of macrophage activity
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Communications, March 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41467-019-09081-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Lena Peters, Ina Weidenfeld, Uwe Klemm, Anita Loeschcke, Robin Weihmann, Karl-Erich Jaeger, Thomas Drepper, Vasilis Ntziachristos, Andre C. Stiel |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 3 | 27% |
| United States | 3 | 27% |
| Canada | 2 | 18% |
| Unknown | 3 | 27% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 45% |
| Scientists | 4 | 36% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 18% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 71 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 71 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 20 | 28% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 6 | 8% |
| Unknown | 18 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 14 | 20% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 11% |
| Engineering | 8 | 11% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 5 | 7% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 12 | 17% |
| Unknown | 21 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 91. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 April 2019.
All research outputs
#455,175
of 24,998,746 outputs
Outputs from Nature Communications
#7,668
of 54,949 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,419
of 357,774 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Communications
#206
of 1,403 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,998,746 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 54,949 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 55.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 357,774 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,403 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.