↓ Skip to main content

How Should Nonprofit Hospitals' Community Benefit Be More Responsive to Health Disparities?

Overview of attention for article published in The AMA Journal of Ethic, March 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
17 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
50 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
How Should Nonprofit Hospitals' Community Benefit Be More Responsive to Health Disparities?
Published in
The AMA Journal of Ethic, March 2019
DOI 10.1001/amajethics.2019.273
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michael Rozier, Susan Goold, Simone Singh

Abstract

In 1956, the Internal Revenue Service created the expectation that nonprofit hospitals would offer uncompensated care for those unable to pay; this was the beginning of Community Benefit (CB). CB efforts tend to prioritize inpatient medical care over developing community-based health improvements, and few CB resources are directed toward responding to health disparities. Changes to federal policy should address these concerns by (1) requiring community partners' involvement in CB implementation strategies, (2) requiring that community health needs assessments (CHNAs) be completed every 5 years instead of every 3 years, (3) changing the Internal Revenue Code to recognize organizations' work on social determinants as CB, and (4) requiring CHNAs to describe a community's health disparities and clarify how their implementation strategies address them. These changes would likely promote hospitals' engagement with public health departments, collaboration with community-based nonprofit organizations, and greater focus on health equity.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 50 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 50 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 8%
Researcher 4 8%
Student > Master 3 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 6%
Student > Bachelor 3 6%
Other 6 12%
Unknown 27 54%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 6 12%
Social Sciences 4 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 4%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 2%
Unspecified 1 2%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 34 68%